Submission
We invite researchers, academics, and practitioners to submit their papers for consideration at INMEC-2026 through EasyChair.
Important Dates
| Submission Deadline | Jan 31, 2026 |
| Acceptance Notification | Feb 10, 2026 |
| Registration Deadline | Feb 15, 2026 |
| Conference Date | March 13-14, 2026 |
Peer Review Process : The peer review process for INMEC 2026 is designed to ensure the highest standards of academic rigor, originality, and relevance. All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review, where both authors’ and reviewers’ identities are kept anonymous to maintain impartiality and fairness throughout the evaluation. Upon submission, each manuscript is first screened by the Technical Program Committee (TPC) for scope alignment, format compliance, and basic quality checks, including plagiarism assessment. Papers meeting the initial criteria are then assigned to two or more expert reviewers with specialized knowledge in the manuscript’s research domain. Reviewers evaluate the submission based on parameters such as novelty, technical depth, methodological soundness, clarity of presentation, relevance to the conference themes, and contribution to the field. The review process includes detailed comments and constructive feedback aimed at improving the quality of the work. Based on reviewers’ recommendations, manuscripts may be categorized as Accepted, Accepted with Minor Revisions, Revisions required, or Rejected. Authors of papers requiring revisions are expected to address all reviewer comments and resubmit their revised manuscript within the stipulated timeframe. Revisions are rechecked, and in some cases reassessed by the same reviewers to ensure the concerns have been satisfactorily resolved. All accepted papers are subjected to an additional editorial quality check by the Publication Committee to ensure consistency, formatting accuracy, ethical compliance, and readiness for publication. Only manuscripts that successfully pass all stages of evaluation will be included in the final publication conference proceedings. The entire peer review workflow is managed through a structured and transparent process to uphold academic integrity and produce a high-quality proceedings volume. This rigorous review system ensures that INMEC 2026 disseminates impactful, credible, and technically strong research to the global engineering community.
Ethics & Malpractice Statement : INMEC-2026 is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in research publication. All authors, reviewers, and editors participating in the conference must adhere to responsible research practices, fairness, transparency and integrity throughout the review and publication process.
- 1. Submissions must be the author’s own original work. All sources, data, and ideas from others must be appropriately cited. Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited.
- 2. Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and may not be shared or discussed with others.
- 3. Papers will be evaluated solely on scholarly merit, relevance, clarity, and adherence to ethical standards.
- 4. All participants are expected to engage respectfully with others, regardless of background, identity, or opinion. Harassment, discrimination, or abusive behavior will not be tolerated.
A concise and precise statement of your research topic. The title should quickly indicate whether the paper is relevant to a reader’s interests, encouraging them to read further into the abstract if intrigued.
The abstract serves as a decisive point for readers to determine if your paper aligns with their interests. It is not just a placeholder but a carefully crafted summary with the following characteristics:
- Expands briefly on the title, typically in 55 words or fewer.
- Highlights the main hypothesis.
- Outlines the problem addressed, the solution proposed, and its innovative aspects.
- Indicates how the results compare with recent related studies.
Select only meaningful terms that represent the broader scope of the subject. Avoid choosing keywords solely to fill the section.
The broader problem context. Technologies and concepts from primary references. The concept or approach proposed. Any necessary mathematical background.
Briefly summarize the most significant references used in your work, devoting one paragraph to each major source. Each summary should:
Present the original author’s understanding of the problem. Describe the methods, technologies, and results. Include comparisons made and critical viewpoints. Indicate how your work differs from and builds upon the reference, focusing on unique contributions.
Present a clear and concise definition of the problem in one to two paragraphs, culminating in a precise problem statement of one or two sentences.
Describe the novel aspects of your work in relation to each major reference cited, showing the contribution of your approach. Problem Formulation / Design
Explain how the problem is modeled and justified. This could be in the form of: Mathematical models. Block diagrams or flowcharts. Algorithms. Domain-specific modeling paradigms.
Outline the problem-solving techniques applied, such as:
Heuristic or simulation-based methods. Mathematical solution approaches. Programming or network simulation methods.
Present results obtained from varied input sets, showing the range within which they are valid.
Include a table or spreadsheet-format summary showing input types, processes, and corresponding outputs.
Compare your outcomes with related studies using graphs or tables. Avoid comparisons based on only a single dataset.
Provide reasoning for why your results hold, supported by references.
Summarize the study, emphasizing its significance.
Acknowledgements (if applicable) Credit individuals or organizations that contributed to the research.
List all cited sources in the appropriate format.